Why I Won’t Settle for Feminism

I grew up in a home that celebrated the diversity between men and women. My parents scoffed in the face of gender stereotypes but championed the true differences that exist between male and female. I have two brothers, and as the only girl I experienced life able to embrace true femininity; I saw how my brothers differed from me in ways that existed at our core, not as a result of expectations.

I wore stereotypical “male” clothing, I played army, and most of my toys were g.i. joes, legos, slingshots and paintball guns. My mom tried to teach all of us to sew and cook, but one of my brothers excelled much more in those typically “female” activities, while I preferred to spend my time exploring. Our home didn’t have gender stereotypes. I was allowed to explore according to my interests, not what was socially expected.

And as we played and explored together my brothers and I learned how different we were from one another. As much as I wanted to be like my brothers I am still female. I was physically tough earning concussions, black eyes and broken noses without shedding tears, but I was emotionally thoughtful and nurturing, something my male brothers just simply didn’t understand. I read the emotions they felt better than they read them themselves, I felt turmoil in ways they didn’t, and I was inherently maternal, seeking to repair hurt feelings. I was happy to follow their lead, whereas they constantly battled for who would call the shots.

My brothers were born protectors, they looked out for me, and protected me and tried to shield me from poor choices and mistakes. Despite the freedom we had to explore the world however we saw fit, we couldn’t help but approach it differently. My brothers are male and interacted as such, I am female and likewise interacted with the world in my own very different way.

My parents modeled (and still do to this day) the beauty of a Complimentarian marriage. My dad loves my mom, with a self-sacrificing love, he listens to her opinions and she gives input in every decision they make; my dad sought to provide for and protect his family. And my mom respects and submits to my dad as the ultimate authority of their home. My mom is such a woman of faith and strength that even when she disagrees with my dad she submits to his final decision because she trusts God with her future. Her biggest focus was caring for our home, nurturing and raising the children she bore and supporting my dad by providing peace and respect. My dad was the authority, not in a heavy-handed way, but through love that allowed my mom to trust him, and by seeing their unity we as children respected them both. My parents compliment one another as they both fulfill the roles they were given, and our home, though imperfect, reflected Christ and the church in such a way that I learned from an early age what the Gospel looks like in life.

And now as a woman, married and raising two boys, I see again the differences of the genders. There are aspects of my sons (most clearly in my toddler) that I cannot relate to. It doesn’t matter that his favorite color is purple and he loves tea parties, his maleness is still his core, and only my husband can really understand those parts of him.

I treasure that our home has so much diversity.

And Feminism just doesn’t allow for that.

Feminism is a reaction to Male Chauvinism (hereafter referred to simply as: Chauvinism). Unfortunately, I think both are deeply flawed.

Chauvinism is flawed at its core because it asserts that males are superior to females. Thus it excuses things like abuse, inequality, and sexism because it claims women are worth less than men. This is very clearly deplorable, and it is responsible for some heinous crimes, and not at all what God designed. The destruction resulting from Chauvinism is horrible, but not what I’m choosing to address here, because I don’t think it requires much explanation.

But Feminism isn’t really better. By its reactionary nature it seeks to annihilate the differences that exist between male and female.  It claims they do not exist. It has mistaken equality with sameness.

But God created men and women equally and differently.

God’s kingdom is diverse, and to try and do away with that diversity is not only flawed but it leads to dangerous territory.

Because when we try and deny reality, we often leave a wake of destruction.

And Feminism has left quite a wake.

Because Feminism is so dead-set on eliminating the differences between men and women in the name of “equality” it excuses and even champions things like abortion because our biology doesn’t support a sameness between sexes. Our biology shouts our differences. We are the ones who can bear and nourish our children. Biologically women cannot be removed from this reality, so in an effort to eradicate diversity Feminism puts itself behind abortion so that our “responsibilities” toward our offspring are leveled. Because women cannot physically flee from motherhood, abortion has become the answer. Instead of calling men to rise to their responsibility even though they are not physically bound, Feminism seeks to bring women down to the irresponsibility of abandoning children in the name of “equality”. (The absurdity of sacrificing an innocent in the name of “equal rights” is enough for another post).

Instead of celebrating the diversity of male and female, Feminism has sought to eradicate it. But the biology is still there. We have even gone so far as to murder to try and rid ourselves of it.

But try as we might, our bodies tell it differently. We are different. And that is a very good thing.

Yours is the body of a woman. What does it signify? Is there invisible meaning in its visible signs–the softness, the smoothness, the lighter bone and muscle structure, the breasts, the womb? Are they utterly unrelated to what you yourself are? Isn’t your identity intimately bound up with these material forms?

Every normal woman is equipped to be a mother. Certainly not every woman in the world is destined to make use of the physical equipment but surely motherhood, in a deeper sense, is the essence of womanhood. […] Motherhood requires self-giving, sacrifice, suffering. It is a going down into death in order to give life, a great human analogy of a great spiritual principle. Womanhood is a call. […] glad if it means the literal bearing of children, thankful as well for all that it means in a much wider sense, that in which every woman, married or single, fruitful or barren, may participate–the unconditional response exemplified for all time in Mary the virgin, and the willingness to enter into suffering, to receive, to carry, to give life, to nurture and to care for others. 

Elisabeth Elliot, Let Me Be a Woman

Diversity is a good thing. We need the qualities that both men and women carry; they are equal in value and equally necessary.

I’m all for doing away with gender stereotypes, they are silly and destructive. But I am unwilling to sacrifice real diversity in the name of so-called “equality”.

Because I’ve seen what true equality and diversity look like, they exist together and compliment one another perfectly. And I know that’s what God’s kingdom looks like.

I know God made me uniquely female, and I celebrate my womanhood as God designed it. My ability to bear, nurture and raise my children. My choice to submit to my husband because my faith is in my God, not myself or my husband. I am thankful for the way my mind works and most thankful that my husband’s, sons’, brothers’ and father’s minds work differently.

You see, I won’t settle for Feminism because it’s vision is too small, homogenous, and a poor representation of reality.

Instead, I choose to embrace the beauty of the kingdom my God created in all its diversity.


  1. Great post! That was really well said.


      1. Seriously, it’s a blessing to read your words and they are much appreciated.


      2. Thank you, I was really nervous for this post so your comment is very very well timed

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Jessica · · Reply

    This is such an inspiring post. Very well said. I can relate in so many ways. Thanks for such a great read.


    1. Thank you, Jessica. Your comment is encouraging 🙂


  3. […] very dear friend responded to my recent blog post, Why I Won’t Settle For Feminism, with some pretty great questions that sparked a conversation between us. I think her questions did […]


  4. Well, I’m not surprised to see InsanityBytes commenting on this post. I can’t understand why anyone would think feminism means anything other than women seeking equal treatment with men. The world would be a much better place if there wasn’t such a power imbalance in favour of men. As for submitting to husbands … honestly, I can scarcely imagine the society you people live in.


    1. I think it’s important to clarify a bit what “Feminism” means. The term didn’t become popular (in fact it was largely despised by most Suffragettes) until the 1960s (though some women adopted it as early as the 1920s they were considered outliers). So, Feminism is really birthed from the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Suffragette’s earned much of what we now consider equal treatment (right to vote, right to keep wages and own property once married, right to file lawsuits, and right to secondary education), the Feminists of the 1960s and onward succeeded in women’s “Reproductive rights”, and Title 9, and in later years attached themselves to LGBQT groups. I believe the Suffragette’s did some work to tip the scale back a bit, but I think Feminists go beyond an “equal treatment” into a territory that largely devalues humans as a whole, as seen in it’s championing abortion. It is worth distinguishing between Suffragette’s and Feminists though, as they are very different movements in nature. And I do think many women who call themselves “feminist” really do believe that they are taking the best course for equality, but their ethos begins in the wrong place, and because of this I don’t think they achieve their goals at all.
      As for the biblical design for marriage. If you don’t subscribe and submit to Christ first, the model doesn’t make sense. Because if you don’t know Jesus, how could you really understand how someone can lead as a servant? But that’s kind of the point. The calling of Christ leaves us in sort of antithetical place as Christians, our lives, in every aspect are supposed to kind of confound you, because we ARE different when we really follow him. Christians don’t really stand to change a society, we stand in the midst of a society, different, and a little bit irritating, because we don’t let others just go on living how our nature’s think we ought. And you must admit, Violet, it entices you a little bit, enough that you spend time considering and debating us.
      Thank you for your comment, by the way. You’re blog is intriguing, I look forward to further hearty discourse 🙂


      1. Sorry, I didn’t see this reply for some reason. Your take on the history of the women’s rights movement is truly bizarre. A handful of legal rights in the 1920s did not mean true equality, it was just the starting point in an ongoing uphill struggle. And access to abortion isn’t simply a feminist issue – it’s a human rights issue.

        “My choice to submit to my husband because my faith is in my God, not myself or my husband.” This kind of sentiment puts so many Christian women in awful situations. You may personally have a loving husband who would never take advantage of the situation, but unfortunately humans, and especially men, tend to abuse power.


      2. My point isn’t that “equality” was gained by Suffrigists, but that Feminism (as distinguished by its birth in the 1960s) has only gained two things in its aim for equality, and one of those things (reproductive rights) is actually, in my opinion harmful to women.
        Oh, I wholeheartedly agree that abortion is a human rights issue. And it’s rather illuminating that an institution such as Feminism who supposedly champions equality and rights would so quickly trample on the most basic right of life for those who are weaker than they.
        Just because men abuse their power (and women as well) doesn’t change the validity of the calling to submission. And as I mentioned in my post, it isn’t a submission to sin or abuse that we are talking about. But again, Feminism has a tendency to literally and figuratively throw the baby out with the bath water


  5. You are a very good writer.

    Here is a good post on feminism:


    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for sharing! I”ll have to check it out soon!


  6. You also might like to read this:

    This is from seven visions that William Branham had in 1933:

    Vision Five: The fifth scene that appeared involved the womanhood of the world. In this scene there appeared the fast moral decay of women. Starting back when she received her so-called liberty to enter into worldly affairs by means of the vote, she soon began to wear clothes that were too revealing. She bobbed her hair and adopted the clothing of men. Finally, the vision showed her all but stripped naked and she merely covered herself with a tiny apron about the size and shape of a fig leaf. With her womanhood so little valued, a terrible decay of all flesh came upon the earth and with it perversion even as set forth by the Word of God.

    Vision Five Fulfillment: Since 1933, the role of women in society has changed dramatically, fulfilling this vision in many different ways, including:

    Increased numbers of women in the work force, which has often left their kids growing up in daycare centers
    Increased indecency in women’s fashions
    Increased degradation of women’s bodies through body piercings, cuttings, and tattoos.
    Shrinking size of women bathing suits to the point they are often smaller than a fig leaf in the front and virtually nude in the back
    Destruction of the fruit of the womb through legalization of abortions in 1973
    Gender confusion culminating in the legalization of same sex marriages in 2015
    Exponential increase in witchcraft through movies and television programs
    Exponential increase in the pornography industry since the introduction of Playboy magazine in 1953 (which now seems relatively tame)



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: